Aquinas’ Third Way from the Standpoint of the Aristotelian Syllogistic

The Monist 69 (2):189-206 (1986)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This first part of Thomas Aquinas’ third way has provoked a variety of allegations on the theme of a quantifier shift fallacy. For even if it be granted that every thing at some time does not exist, that is

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,571

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The logic of the liar from the standpoint of the Aristotelian syllogistic.Charles J. Kelly - 1990 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 32 (1):129-146.
A reconstruction of Aristotle's modal syllogistic.Marko Malink - 2006 - History and Philosophy of Logic 27 (2):95-141.
Logics for the relational syllogistic.Ian Pratt-Hartmann & Lawrence S. Moss - 2009 - Review of Symbolic Logic 2 (4):647-683.
Aquinas and quantifier mistakes.Anders John - 2012 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 71 (2):137-143.
Is There a Modal Syllogistic?Adriane A. Rini - 1998 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 39 (4):554-572.
Intellectual Substance as Form of the Body in Aquinas.Donald C. Abel - 1995 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 69:227-236.
Logic, History of: Ancient Logic.Susanne Bobzien - 2006 - In Donald M. Borchert (ed.), Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Thomson Gale.
Ancient logic.Susanne Bobzien - 2012 - In Peter Adamson (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-02-21

Downloads
88 (#191,907)

6 months
11 (#231,656)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Aquinas and quantifier mistakes.Anders John - 2012 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 71 (2):137-143.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references