Deleuze, Klossowski, Cinema, Immobility: A Response to Stephen Arnott

Film-Philosophy 5 (2) (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Stephen Arnott 'Deleuze's Idea of Cinema' _Film-Philosophy_, Deleuze Special Issue vol. 5 no. 32, November 2001.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.3366/film.2001.0033

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 99,445

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Fugitive Spaces -- Between the Critical and the Creative: A Reply to Amy Herzog.Barbara M. Kennedy - 2001 - Film-Philosophy 5 (2).
The Laws of Cinematic Hospitality: A Response to Andrew Murphie.Gregory Flaxman - 2001 - Film-Philosophy 5 (2).
La Longue durée: A Reply to Joseph Nechvatal.Dorothea Olkowski - 2001 - Film-Philosophy 5 (2).
Emergent Senses: A Response to Swalwell.Laura U. Marks - 2002 - Film-Philosophy 6 (3).
Last Things First: A Reply to Sutton.Garrett Stewart - 2001 - Film-Philosophy 5 (1).
Thinking with Cinema: Deleuze and Film Theory.Jeffrey Bell - 1997 - Film-Philosophy 1 (1).
Film, Philosophy, and the Ordinary: A Response to Butle.Thomas E. Wartenberg - 2001 - Film-Philosophy 5 (1).
Deleuze and cinema: the film concepts.Felicity Colman - 2011 - New York: Berg.
Reply to MacKinnon and Sorfa.Laura Mulvey - 2001 - Film-Philosophy 5 (1).

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-24

Downloads
60 (#292,972)

6 months
10 (#288,070)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Eleanor Kaufman
University of California, Los Angeles

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references