The Problem of Human Rights in the "Declaration of Independence" and Current Ideological Conflicts in the United States

Russian Studies in Philosophy 16 (3):35-51 (1977)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The political independence of the United States of America was proclaimed in a Declaration of Independence by the Second Continental Congress, in Philadelphia, on July 4, 1776. Thomas Jefferson drafted the document, and the changes made in the text reflected the struggle among different factions in the revolutionary camp. Jefferson's initial version was fundamentally retained, however; and that is precisely what makes the Declaration of Independence not merely a legal document but a vivid example of a bourgeois revolutionary program expressing in concentrated form the ideology of the radical wing of the American Enlightenment. The form of the Declaration was an address to world public opinion explaining the causes and bases for the decisive political break of the 13 British colonies with the home country. In fact it provided a general philosophical justification for the validity of revolutionary change in the social order by the people. The Declaration became the legal ground for the American system of government, sanctioning its independence and serving as the basis for the documents of a constitutional nature that followed. The treatment of the nature of man and his rights is the most important feature of the revolutionary conclusions of the Declaration

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,881

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Human Rights in Indian Context.Sivanandam Panneerselvam - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 11:85-91.
Human Rights.Rex Martin - 2006 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 2:175-181.
Defending the indefensible.Udo Schuklenk - 2010 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 7 (1):83-88.
The Ambiguity of the Term 'Culture' and its Consequences for the Protection of Human Rights.Nermin Gedik - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 7:33-36.
Which rights should be universal?William Talbott - 2005 - New York: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-12-11

Downloads
22 (#709,072)

6 months
10 (#268,574)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Soviet writings on jewish press freedom: A descriptive bibliography.Toby Terrar - 1984 - Studies in East European Thought 28 (3):201-228.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references