Privacy and Private Language

In Hans-Johann Glock & John Hyman (eds.), A Companion to Wittgenstein. Chichester, West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 443–464 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This chapter discusses Wittgenstein's private language arguments in both the broad and the narrow sense. It begins by introducing the traditional ideas Wittgenstein's arguments can be seen as undermining. In fact, Wittgenstein points out, it is not bodies that have pains, rather living beings. Only 'of a living human being and what resembles a living human being can one say: it has sensations; it sees; is blind; hears; is deaf; is conscious or unconscious'. Many philosophers have shared the picture or aspects of the picture underlying these views, and have sublimated them into philosophical theories. The chapter examines the relation between the inner and outer, the relation between sensation and its natural and linguistic expression. It explores private ownership that is the impossibility of different people having the same sensation. The paradigmatic application of the qualitative‐numerical distinction is the case of physical objects, objects with a spatiotemporal location.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,590

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Privacy and Private Language.A. Haque - 1988 - Indian Philosophical Quarterly 15 (1):75.
Privacy and Private Language.Ashok Vohra - 1976 - Indian Philosophical Quarterly 3 (4):505-524.
Privacy and Private Language.Ashok Vohra - 1976 - Indian Philosophical Quarterly 4 (1):25-40.
Wittgenstein's Private Language Argument.George Wrisley - 2011-09-16 - In Michael Bruce & Steven Barbone (eds.), Just the Arguments. Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 350–354.
Wittgenstein on sensation and 'seeing-as'.Charles E. M. Dunlop - 1984 - Synthese 60 (September):349-368.
Is a sensation a concept-involving object?Haiqiang Dai - 2021 - South African Journal of Philosophy 40 (1):99-116.
Does the Tractatus Contain a Private Language Argument?William Child - 2013 - In Peter M. Sullivan & Michael D. Potter (eds.), Wittgenstein's Tractatus: history and interpretation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 143-169.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-06-09

Downloads
23 (#160,613)

6 months
7 (#1,397,300)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Edward Kanterian
University of Kent

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references