The surprising thing about musical surprise

Analysis 78 (2):225-234 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The experience of musical surprise is explained by psychologists in terms of the thwarting of prior musical expectations. The assumption that surprise is always caused by expectations is widespread not just in psychology at large, but also in philosophy. I argue here that this assumption is ill-founded. Many musical surprises, as well as many non-musical instances of perceptual surprise, can be explained by the falsification of assessments of the present, rendering the appeal to expectations unnecessary. I elaborate the positive view before considering objections, and offering replies.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,752

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The argument from surprise.Adrian Currie - 2018 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 48 (5):639-661.
On a so‐Called Solution to a Paradox.Michael Veber - 2015 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 97 (2):283-297.
Some surprising facts about surprising facts.D. Mayo - 2014 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 45:79-86.
Ars perfecta: Toward perfection in musical performance?Peter Kivy - 2006 - British Journal of Aesthetics 46 (2):111-132.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-12-09

Downloads
105 (#166,428)

6 months
11 (#233,459)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jenny Judge
New York University

Citations of this work

The Value of Surprise in Science.Steven French & Alice Murphy - 2023 - Erkenntnis 88 (4):1447-1466.
Moral Shock.Katie Stockdale - 2022 - Journal of the American Philosophical Association 8 (3):496-511.
WTF?! Covid-19, Indignation, and the Internet.Lucy Osler - 2023 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 22 (5):1-20.
Do We Visually Experience Objects’ Occluded Parts?Matt E. M. Bower - 2021 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 51 (4):239-255.

Add more citations