Significance Testing with No Alternative Hypothesis: A Measure of Surprise

Erkenntnis 70 (2):253-270 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A pure significance test would check the agreement of a statistical model with the observed data even when no alternative model was available. The paper proposes the use of a modified p -value to make such a test. The model will be rejected if something surprising is observed. It is shown that the relation between this measure of surprise and the surprise indices of Weaver and Good is similar to the relationship between a p -value, a corresponding odds-ratio, and a logit or log-odds statistic. The s -value is always larger than the corresponding p -value, and is not uniformly distributed. Difficulties with the whole approach are discussed

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,590

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Paraconsistent Sensitivity Analysis for Bayesian Significance Tests.Julio Michael Stern - 2004 - Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 3171:134-143.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
26 (#145,883)

6 months
10 (#1,198,792)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Theory of Probability.Harold Jeffreys - 1940 - Philosophy of Science 7 (2):263-264.
On the Concept of a Random Sequence.Alonzo Church - 1940 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 5 (2):71-72.
On the Concept of a Random Sequence.Alonzo Church - 1940 - Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 46 (2):130--135.
A statistical paradox.D. V. Lindley - 1957 - Biometrika 44 (1/2):187-192.
Theory of Probability. [REVIEW]Ernest Nagel - 1940 - Journal of Philosophy 37 (19):524-528.

View all 6 references / Add more references