Defending Wokeness: A Response to Davidson

Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 12 (6):21-26 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Lacey J. Davidson (2023) raises several insightful objections to the group partiality account of wokeness. The paper aims to move the discussion forward by either responding to or developing Davidson’s objections. My goal is not to show that the partiality account is foolproof but to think about the direction of future discussion—future critique, modification, and response. Davidson thinks that the partiality account of wokeness does not sufficiently define wokeness, as the paper sets out to do. Davidson also alleges that the account appropriates the term from minority communities.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Defining Wokeness.J. Spencer Atkins - 2023 - Social Epistemology 37 (3):321-338.
Quine and Davidson: Two naturalized epistemologists.Roger F. Gibson - 1994 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 37 (4):449 – 463.
Davidson on Self‐Knowledge: A Transcendental Explanation.Ali Hossein Khani - 2021 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 59 (2):153-184.
Logical Form.Miguel Hoeltje - 2013 - In Ernest LePore & Kirk Ludwig (eds.), A Companion to Donald Davidson (Blackwell Companions to Philosophy). Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.
Some Anomalies in Kim’s Account of Davidson.Alexander Miller - 1993 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 31 (3):335-44.
Language Learning in Wittgenstein and Davidson.Ben Kotzee - 2013 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 33 (4):413-431.
A radical interpretation of Davidson: Reply to Alvarez.Hans-Johann Glock - 1995 - Philosophical Quarterly 45 (179):206-212.
Intention.Luca Ferrero - 2013 - In Ernie Lepore & Kurt Ludwig (eds.), Blackwell Companion to Donald Davidson. Blackwell. pp. 75-89.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-06-27

Downloads
193 (#104,062)

6 months
109 (#47,904)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

J. Spencer Atkins
State University of New York at Binghamton

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

On the epistemic costs of implicit bias.Tamar Szabó Gendler - 2011 - Philosophical Studies 156 (1):33-63.
Epistemic partiality in friendship.Sarah Stroud - 2006 - Ethics 116 (3):498-524.
On Epistemic Appropriation.Emmalon Davis - 2018 - Ethics 128 (4):702-727.
Defining Wokeness.J. Spencer Atkins - 2023 - Social Epistemology 37 (3):321-338.

View all 7 references / Add more references