Is the “Point” of the Market Pareto or Kaldor-Hicks Efficiency?

Business Ethics Journal Review 7 (4):21-26 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Moriarty argues that the Market Failures Approach to business ethics is inapplicable to “real world” problems, because it treats “market failure” as a failure to achieve Pareto efficiency. Depending upon how it is applied, Pareto efficiency is either trivially easy to satisfy or else so demanding that no real-world market could ever satisfy it. In this Commentary, I argue that Moriarty overstates these difficulties. The regulatory structure governing markets is best understood as an attempt to maximize the number of Pareto-improving exchanges that occur. There is no reason to think business self-regulation cannot be guided by the same normative-conceptual framework.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,069

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-06-27

Downloads
92 (#190,700)

6 months
27 (#113,742)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile