Pareto efficiency in multiple referendum

Theory and Decision 72 (4):525-536 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We consider situations of multiple referendum: finitely many yes-or-no issues have to be socially assessed from a set of approval ballots, where voters approve as many issues as they want. Each approval ballot is extended to a complete preorder over the set of outcomes by means of a preference extension. We characterize, under a mild richness condition, the largest domain of top-consistent and separable preference extensions for which issue-wise majority voting is Pareto efficient, i.e., always yields out a Pareto-optimal outcome. Top-consistency means that voters’ ballots are their unique most preferred outcome. It appears that the size of this domain becomes negligible relative to the size of the full domain as the number of issues increases

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The pareto efficiency and expected costs of k-majority rules.Keith L. Dougherty & Julian Edward - 2004 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 3 (2):161-189.
The pareto argument and inequality.Patrick Shaw - 1999 - Philosophical Quarterly 49 (196):353-368.
The Pareto rule and strategic voting.Ian MacIntyre - 1991 - Theory and Decision 31 (1):1-19.
Envy and efficiency.Joseph Heath - 2006 - Revue de Philosophie Économique 13.
Can economics rank slavery against free labor in terms of efficiency?Lawrence H. White - 2008 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 7 (3):327-340.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-01

Downloads
57 (#269,932)

6 months
5 (#544,079)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations