Scientism or luddism: Is informed ethical dialogue possible?

American Journal of Bioethics 4 (1):18 – 20 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This Article does not have an abstract

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,435

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Are luddites confused?Dan Lyons - 1979 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 22 (1-4):381 – 403.
What is scientism?Mikael Stenmark - 1997 - Religious Studies 33 (1):15-32.
A linguistic model of informed consent.Jan Marta - 1996 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 21 (1):41-60.
Informed consent as waiver: the doctrine rethought?Emma C. Bullock - 2010 - Ethical Perspectives 17 (4):529-555.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
13 (#1,020,434)

6 months
3 (#987,746)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Nancy Jones
Liberty University

References found in this work

Human embryo research and the language of moral uncertainty.William P. Cheshire - 2004 - American Journal of Bioethics 4 (1):1 – 5.
Embryos, words, and numbers: The ethical treatment of opinion.Jeremy B. A. Green - 2004 - American Journal of Bioethics 4 (1):7 – 9.
Human embryos and the language of scientific research.Jane Maienschein - 2004 - American Journal of Bioethics 4 (1):6 – 7.
Human embryo research: From moral uncertainty to death.Frederick Grinnell - 2004 - American Journal of Bioethics 4 (1):12 – 13.

View all 6 references / Add more references