Kant’s Ongoing Relevance for Philosophy of Science

Kantian Review 28 (3):337-354 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this introductory article we reconstruct several broad developments in the scholarship on Kant’s theory of natural science with a particular focus on the Anglophone context over the past half-century. Our goal is to illuminate the co-development of Kant scholarship and the philosophy of science during this period and to identify points of influence in both directions. In section 2 we present an overview of the scholarship on Kant’s account of natural laws. In section 3 we survey the diverse interpretations of Kant’s views on biology and consider recent appeals to Kant by philosophers of biology. In section 4 we explore several recent developments in philosophy of science that have potential synergies with Kant scholarship. Our aim is not simply to establish that Kant’s philosophy can have relevance for philosophy of science but also to point out where it has been and continues to be relevant. Appreciating this relevance, we suggest, can help identify productive lines of inquiry for Kant studies.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,435

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Kant and the Laws of Nature.Michela Massimi & Angela Breitenbach (eds.) - 2017 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Unity for Kant’s Natural Philosophy.Marius Stan - 2014 - Philosophy of Science 81 (3):423-443.
Kant's Philosophy of Science.Eric Watkins & Marius Stan - 2023 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Kant and Philosophy of Science Today.Michela Massimi (ed.) - 2008 - Cambridge University Press.
Kant and Philosophy of Science Today: Volume 63.Michela Massimi (ed.) - 2008 - Cambridge University Press.
Kant and the Laws of Nature ed. by Michela Massimi, Angela Breitenbach.Reed Winegar - 2018 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 56 (2):377-378.
How is biological explanation possible?Alex Rosenberg - 2001 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 52 (4):735-760.
Kant and the scope of analogy in the life sciences.Hein van den Berg - 2018 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 71:67-76.
Rehabilitating the Regulative Use of Reason: Kant on Empirical and Chemical Laws.Michael Bennett McNulty - 2015 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 54:1-10.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-10-11

Downloads
18 (#819,350)

6 months
13 (#186,332)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Andrew Cooper
University of Warwick

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

New work for a theory of universals.David K. Lewis - 1983 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 61 (4):343-377.
On the Plurality of Worlds.David Lewis - 1986 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 178 (3):388-390.
Critique of Pure Reason.I. Kant - 1787/1998 - Philosophy 59 (230):555-557.
Counterfactuals.David Lewis - 1973 - Foundations of Language 13 (1):145-151.

View all 43 references / Add more references