Validity of the Einstein hole argument

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 68:62-70 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1016/j.shpsb.2019.04.008

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,853

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Einstein algebras and the hole argument.Jonathan Bain - 2003 - Philosophy of Science 70 (5):1073-1085.
Einstein's hole argument.Alan Macdonald - 2001 - American Journal of Physics 69:223-225.
Einstein's Hole Argument and its Legacy.Hanns Hagen Goetzke - unknown
Disregarding the 'Hole Argument'.Bryan W. Roberts - unknown
Regarding the ‘Hole Argument’.James Owen Weatherall - 2018 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 69 (2):329-350.
Some Philosophical Prehistory of the (Earman-Norton) hole argument.James Owen Weatherall - 2020 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 70:79-87.
Algebraic substantivalism and the hole argument.Jonathan Bain - manuscript
Einstein and EPR.Robert Deltete & Reed Guy - 1991 - Philosophy of Science 58 (3):377-397.
Leibniz Equivalence. On Leibniz's Influence on the Logical Empiricist Interpretation of General Relativity.Marco Giovanelli - unknown
The Hole Argument Against Everything.Joshua Norton - 2020 - Foundations of Physics 50 (4):360-378.
Einstein, the Hole Argument and the Reality of Space.John D. Norton - 1982 - In John Norton (ed.).
The Einstein shift in Einstein's box experiment.H. -J. Treder - 1975 - Foundations of Physics 5 (1):135-142.
Regarding the ‘Hole Argument’.James Owen Weatherall - 2016 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science:axw012.
The Moral Black Hole.Per Sandin & Misse Wester - 2009 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 12 (3):291-301.
Out of the Labyrinth: Einstein, Hertz and Göttingen Answer to the Hole Argument.John D. Norton & Don Howard - 1982 - In John Norton (ed.).

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-07-10

Downloads
9 (#1,252,744)

6 months
7 (#428,584)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

General Relativity and Philosophy.Mohammad Ebrahim Maghsoudi & Mehdi Golshani - 2021 - Journal of Philosophical Investigations 15 (37):42-69.

Add more citations

References found in this work

What price spacetime substantivalism? The hole story.John Earman & John Norton - 1987 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 38 (4):515-525.
Regarding the ‘Hole Argument’.James Owen Weatherall - 2018 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 69 (2):329-350.
Regarding the ‘Hole Argument’.James Owen Weatherall - 2016 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science:axw012.
The Hole Argument.John D. Norton - 1988 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:56 - 64.

Add more references