Validity of the Einstein hole argument

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 68:62-70 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1016/j.shpsb.2019.04.008

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 104,101

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Bringing the hole argument back in the loop: A response to Pooley.Dean Rickles - 2006 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 37 (2):381-387.
A hole revolution, or are we back where we started?Oliver Pooley - 2006 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 37 (2):372-380.
On black hole complementarity.Jeroen van Dongen & Sebastian de Haro - 2004 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 35 (3):509-525.
Einstein studies in Russia.A. A. Pechenkin - 2004 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 35 (1):120-124.
Playing dice with Einstein.Michael D. Gordin - 2002 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 33 (1):95-100.
Einstein and the Kaluza–Klein particle.Jeroen van Dongen - 2002 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 33 (2):185-210.
Ten theses on black hole entropy.Rafael D. Sorkin - 2005 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 36 (2):291-301.
Electrodynamics from Ampère to Einstein.P. M. Harman - 2002 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 33 (2):371-373.
Did Einstein prove E=mc2?Hans C. Ohanian - 2009 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 40 (2):167-173.
Einstein Studies, volume 11: A retrospective review.David E. Rowe - 2008 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 39 (3):667-686.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-07-10

Downloads
14 (#1,357,676)

6 months
1 (#1,593,032)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

General Relativity and Philosophy.Mohammad Ebrahim Maghsoudi & Mehdi Golshani - 2021 - Journal of Philosophical Investigations 15 (37):42-69.

Add more citations

References found in this work

What price spacetime substantivalism? The hole story.John Earman & John Norton - 1987 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 38 (4):515-525.
Regarding the ‘Hole Argument’.James Owen Weatherall - 2018 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 69 (2):329-350.
Regarding the ‘Hole Argument’.James Owen Weatherall - 2016 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science:axw012.
The Hole Argument.John D. Norton - 1988 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:56 - 64.

Add more references