Philosophy of Science 70 (5):1073-1085 (2003)

Authors
Jonathan Bain
New York University
Abstract
Einstein algebras have been suggested (Earman 1989) and rejected (Rynasiewicz 1992) as a way to avoid the hole argument against spacetime substantivalism. In this article, I debate their merits and faults. In particular, I suggest that a gauge‐invariant interpretation of Einstein algebras that avoids the hole argument can be associated with one approach to quantizing gravity, and, for this reason, is at least as well motivated as sophisticated substantivalist and relationalist interpretations of the standard tensor formalism
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2003
DOI 10.1086/377390
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,163
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Equivalent and Inequivalent Formulations of Classical Mechanics.Thomas William Barrett - 2019 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 70 (4):1167-1199.
On Einstein Algebras and Relativistic Spacetimes.Sarita Rosenstock, Thomas William Barrett & James Owen Weatherall - 2015 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 52 (Part B):309-316.
Some Philosophical Prehistory of the (Earman-Norton) Hole Argument.James Owen Weatherall - 2020 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 70:79-87.

View all 12 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Hole Argument.John D. Norton - 1988 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:56 - 64.
Einstein's Hole Argument.Alan Macdonald - 2001 - American Journal of Physics 69:223-225.
Holes, Haecceitism and Two Conceptions of Determinism.Joseph Melia - 1999 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 50 (4):639--64.
Albert Einstein Meets David Lewis.Jeremy Butterfield - 1988 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:65-81.
Determinism and Modality.Carolyn Brighouse - 1997 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (4):465-481.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
114 ( #102,690 of 2,507,013 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #417,155 of 2,507,013 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes