Journal of Value Inquiry 23 (2):157-168 (1989)
AbstractThis article defends a new model of personal privacy. Privacy should be understood as demarcating culturally defined aspects of an individual's life in which he or she is granted immunity from the judgment of others. Such an analysis is preferable to either of the two favorite models of privacy in the current literature. The judgment of others model preserves all of the insights of the liberty and information models of privacy, But avoids the obvious problems and counterexamples. In addition, This model allows us to better see the normative importance of privacy. A final section discusses the notion of sexual privacy in connection to the proposed model
Similar books and articles
Built-in privacy—no panacea, but a necessary condition for effective privacy protection.Alexander Dix - 2010 - Identity in the Information Society 3 (2):257-265.
Biobank research and the right to privacy.Lars Øystein Ursin - 2008 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29 (4):267-285.
Four challenges for a theory of informational privacy.Luciano Floridi - 2006 - Ethics and Information Technology 8 (3):109–119.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Privacy rights and ‘naked’ statistical evidence.Lauritz Aastrup Munch - 2021 - Philosophical Studies 178 (11):3777-3795.
Anti-Theism and the Objective Meaningful Life Argument.Kirk Lougheed - 2017 - Dialogue 56 (2).
Privacy in the information age: Stakeholders, interests and values. [REVIEW]Lucas Introna & Athanasia Pouloudi - 1999 - Journal of Business Ethics 22 (1):27 - 38.
Epistemological dimensions of informational privacy.Klemens Kappel - 2013 - Episteme 10 (2):179-192.
References found in this work
Privacy, intimacy, and personhood.Jeffrey H. Reiman - 1976 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 6 (1):26-44.