To Believe or not to Believe - That is not the (Only) Question: the Hybrid View of Privacy

The Journal of Ethics (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX


In this paper, we defend what we call the ‘Hybrid View’ of privacy. According to this view, an individual has privacy if, and only if, no one else forms an epistemically warranted belief about the individual’s personal matters, nor perceives them. We contrast the Hybrid View with what seems to be the most common view of what it means to access someone’s personal matters, namely the Belief-Based View. We offer a range of examples that demonstrate why the Hybrid View is more plausible than the Belief-Based View. Finally, we show how the Hybrid View generates a more plausible fit between the concept of privacy, and a (morally objectionable) violation of privacy.



External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Right to Privacy.Lloyd L. Weinreb - 2000 - Social Philosophy and Policy 17 (2):25.
The Right to Privacy*: LLOYD L. WEINREB.Lloyd L. Weinreb - 2000 - Social Philosophy and Policy 17 (2):25-44.
Privacy, Interests, and Inalienable Rights.Adam D. Moore - 2018 - Moral Philosophy and Politics 5 (2):327-355.
Biobank research and the right to privacy.Lars Øystein Ursin - 2008 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29 (4):267-285.
Privacy and the Right to Privacy.H. J. McCloskey - 1980 - Philosophy 55 (211):17 - 38.
Global ICT‐ethics: the case of privacy.Göran Collste - 2008 - Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 6 (1):76-87.
New Ways of Thinking about Privacy.B. Roessler - 2006 - In Anne Philips Bonnie Honig & John Dryzek (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Political Theory. Oxford University Press. pp. 694-713.
Privacy Rights: Moral and Legal Foundations. [REVIEW]Mark Tunick - 2011 - Social Theory and Practice 37 (3):510-517.
Privacy, speech, and values: what we have no business knowing.Adam D. Moore - 2016 - Ethics and Information Technology 18 (1):41-49.
Why should we respect the privacy of donors of biological material?Torbjörn Tännsjö - 2011 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 14 (1):43-52.
E-mail, terrorism, and the right to privacy.Stephen Coleman - 2006 - Ethics and Information Technology 8 (1):17-27.
The Internet and Privacy.Carissa Veliz - 2019 - In David Edmonds (ed.), Ethics and the Contemporary World. Abingdon, UK: Routledge. pp. 149-159.
Does privacy undermine community.Mark Tunick - 2001 - Journal of Value Inquiry 35 (4):517-534.
Privacy as life, liberty, property.Richard Volkman - 2003 - Ethics and Information Technology 5 (4):199-210.
An Intrusion Theory of Privacy.George E. Panichas - 2014 - Res Publica 20 (2):145-161.


Added to PP

76 (#164,551)

6 months
76 (#18,297)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Lauritz Munch
Aarhus University
Jakob Mainz
Aalborg University (PhD)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references