Field notes

Hastings Center Report 35 (2):pp. c2-c2 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The theoretical value of talking to the media isn’t hard to appreciate. Who doesn’t want to shape the public conversation, whether to make it more nuanced and reasoned or to bring injustice and wrongdoing to light? Issues you’ve studied are in the news and you get to be the expert, pointing out what’s wrong, or right, or offering another way of thinking about a difficult question. If you’re lucky, you get your name in print—and in a publication your friends and family actually read. But it can also be intimidating. I used to feel like the hapless witness about to be cross-examined by the wily attorney. I’d heard about the twenty-four-hour news cycle and the push to appeal to the lowest common denominator. ..

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,438

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Objectivity in the news: Finding a way forward.Carrie Figdor - 2010 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 25 (1):19 – 33.
Field Notes.Susan Gilbert - 2008 - Hastings Center Report 38 (5):i-i.
I Can’t Believe I’m Stupid.Andy Egan & Adam Elga - 2005 - Philosophical Perspectives 19 (1):77–93.
Serving the public and serving the market: A conflict of interest?John McManus - 1992 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 7 (4):196 – 208.
Ii. Nietzschean notes on the Tennessen-Naess exchange.Stanley Paluch - 1975 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 18 (1):101 – 102.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
48 (#325,695)

6 months
1 (#1,506,218)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Josephine Johnston
The Hastings Center

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references