Forbidden Knowledge and Science as Professional Activity

The Monist 79 (2):197-217 (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Since the idea of forbidden knowledge is rooted in the biblical story of Adam and Eve eating from the forbidden tree of knowledge, its meaning today, in particular as a metaphor for scientific knowledge, is not so obvious. We can and should ask questions about the autonomy of science.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,783

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Against Professional Development.Erica McWilliam - 2002 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 34 (3):289-299.
Forbidden subgraphs in terms of forbidden quantifiers.T. A. McKee - 1978 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 19 (1):186-188.
Forbidden subgraphs and forbidden substructures.Gregory Cherlin & Niandong Shi - 2001 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 66 (3):1342-1352.
Scientific knowledge: a sociological analysis.Barry Barnes - 1996 - London: Athlone. Edited by David Bloor & John Henry.
Instituting science: Discovery or construction of scientific knowledge?James A. Marcum - 2008 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 22 (2):185 – 210.
Rethinking Philosophy of Science Today.Evandro Agazzi - 2012 - Journal of Philosophical Research 37 (9999):85-101.
Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science.Alan G. Gross - 1990 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 21 (2):341-349.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
60 (#267,427)

6 months
1 (#1,467,486)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?