- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
When Denial Hurts the Children: An Argument for Accountability of Denial in Parental Decision Making
American Journal of Bioethics 18 (9):33-35 (2018)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)My notes
Similar books and articles
When Love Hurts Children: Controlling the Feelings of Minors.M. Carmela Epright & Sara Waller - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics 13 (11):28-29.
Parental Decision Making and the Limitations of the Equivalence Thesis.Dougals Diekema & Aaron Wightman - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (3):43-45.
Parental Decision Making and the Limitations of the Equivalence Thesis.Aaron Wightman & Douglas Diekema - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (3):43-45.
Life and death choices in neonatal care: applying shared decision-making focused on parental values.Alexander A. Kon - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (2):35 - 36.
Eliciting Parental Values and Preferences in the Medical Decision-Making Process.Alissa Swota & Scott Bradfield - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics 15 (5):34-35.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on ‘‘In Defense of ‘Denial’: Difficulty Knowing When Beliefs Are Unrealistic and Whether Unrealistic Beliefs Are Bad”.J. S. Blumenthal-Barby & Peter A. Ubel - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (9):3-5.
Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis for Intersex Conditions: Beyond Parental Decision Making.Kristina Gupta & Sara M. Freeman - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics 13 (10):49 - 51.
Hope, Denial, and Third-Party Effects.Dale Murray - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (9):31-33.
Off-Target Effects of a Defense of Denial.Mary Anderlik Majumder & Christopher Thomas Scott - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (9):22-24.
The impact of physician denial upon patient autonomy and well-being.C. Meyers - 1992 - Journal of Medical Ethics 18 (3):135-137.
Analytics
Added to PP
2018-09-21
Downloads
38 (#407,915)
6 months
9 (#438,283)
2018-09-21
Downloads
38 (#407,915)
6 months
9 (#438,283)
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
The zone of parental discretion: An ethical tool for dealing with disagreement between parents and doctors about medical treatment for a child.Lynn Gillam - 2016 - Clinical Ethics 11 (1):1-8.
Harm is all you need? Best interests and disputes about parental decision-making.Giles Birchley - 2016 - Journal of Medical Ethics 42 (2):111-115.
From “Longshot” to “Fantasy”: Obligations to Pediatric Patients and Families When Last-Ditch Medical Efforts Fail.Elliott Mark Weiss & Autumn Fiester - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (1):3-11.
In Defense of “Denial”: Difficulty Knowing When Beliefs Are Unrealistic and Whether Unrealistic Beliefs Are Bad.J. S. Blumenthal-Barby & Peter A. Ubel - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (9):4-15.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6686886f5-sqlzn uwo