Social preference experiments in animals: Strengthening the case for human preferences

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (1):30-31 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Guala appears to take social preferences for granted in his discussion of reciprocity experiments. While he does not overtly claim that social preferences are only by-products that arise in testing environments, he does assert that whatever they are they have little value in the real world. Experiments on animals suggest that social preferences may be unique to humans, supporting the idea that they might play a prominent role in our world

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,102

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Singer on killing and the preference for life.Michael Lockwood - 1979 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 22 (1-4):157 – 170.
A strawson–lewis defence of social preferences.Jelle de Boer - 2012 - Economics and Philosophy 28 (3):291-310.
In defense of adaptive preferences.Donald W. Bruckner - 2009 - Philosophical Studies 142 (3):307 - 324.
Can Animals have preference-interests?Julia Tanne - 2007 - Ethic@ - An International Journal for Moral Philosophy 6 (1):35-40.
Where do preferences come from?Franz Dietrich & Christian List - 2013 - International Journal of Game Theory 42 (3):613-637.
Precedent autonomy and subsequent consent.John K. Davis - 2004 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 7 (3):267-291.
Are all preferences nosy?Keith Graham - 2000 - Res Publica 6 (2):133-154.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-27

Downloads
19 (#705,026)

6 months
1 (#1,149,473)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?