Banning 'redskins' from the sports page: The ethics and politics of native american nicknames

Journal of Mass Media Ethics 9 (1):16 – 25 (1994)

Abstract

In February 1992, The (Portland) Oregonian announced it would no longer use sports team names that readers may find offensive, such as Redskins, Redmen, Indians, and Braves. Many journalists have criticized The Oregonian's decision, calling it an abandonment of the journalistic principles of objectivity and neutrality. This article addresses the ethical/political issues involved in the controversy through an examination of commentaries by journalists published in newspapers and public comments made by journalists critical of The Oregonian. After evaluating the explicit and implicit assumptions behind those criticisms of The Oregonian, a defense of the newspaper's decision that relies on more overtly political arguments than the paper's managers used will be offered.

Download options

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 72,660

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
50 (#230,549)

6 months
1 (#388,311)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

The Whole World Is Watching.Todd Gitlin - 1982 - Science and Society 46 (1):100-103.

Add more references

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations