Is There a Natural Sexual Inequality of Intellect? A Reply to Kimura

Hypatia 11 (3):24 - 46 (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The noted psychologist, Doreen Kimura, has argued that we should not expect to find equal numbers of men and women in various professions because there is a natural sexual inequality of intellect. In rebuttal I argue that each of these mutually supporting theses is insufficiently supported by the evidence to be accepted. The social and ethical dimensions of Kimura's work, and of the scientific study of the nature-nurture controversy in general, are briefly discussed

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,296

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-10

Downloads
7 (#1,413,139)

6 months
44 (#96,756)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Mismeasure of Man.Stephen Jay Gould - 1980 - W.W. Norton and Company.
The Scientist Qua Scientist Makes Value Judgments.Richard Rudner - 1953 - Philosophy of Science 20 (1):1-6.
Biology as ideology: the doctrine of DNA.Richard C. Lewontin - 1991 - New York, NY: HarperPerennial.
The Mismeasure of Man.Stephen Jay Gould - 1983 - Ethics 94 (1):153-155.
Women and the Mathematical Mystique.H. R. Pitt, Fox, Brody & Tobin - 1982 - British Journal of Educational Studies 30 (2):251.

View all 9 references / Add more references