Health Care Reform: What History Doesn’t Teach

Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 26 (4):277-305 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The paper begins by tracing the historical development of American medicine as practice, profession, and industry from the eighteenth century to the present. This historical outline emphasizes shifting conceptions of physicians and physician ethics. It lays the basis for showing, in the second section, how contemporary controversies about the physician’s role in managed care take root in medicine’s past. In the final two sections, I revisit both the historical analysis and its application to contemporary debates. I argue that historical narratives can function as “master narratives” that suppress or leave out historical facts. I bring to the surface what is covered up by the master narrative approach, and show its relevance to contemporary ethical debates. I conclude by proposing that preserving the integrity of medicine will require modifying the master narratives we tell about physicians. The integrity of medicine also offers new perspectives for thinking about managed care and the broader topic of health care reform.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,672

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
97 (#177,559)

6 months
6 (#509,130)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Nancy Jecker
University of Washington

References found in this work

Principles of biomedical ethics.Tom L. Beauchamp - 1994 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by James F. Childress.
The birth of bioethics.Albert R. Jonsen - 1998 - New York: Oxford University Press.
For the patient's good: the restoration of beneficence in health care.Edmund D. Pellegrino - 1988 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by David C. Thomasma.
Standing for something.Cheshire Calhoun - 1995 - Journal of Philosophy 92 (5):235-260.

View all 18 references / Add more references