The Effect of Eurasian Orientation on the Relations between Russia and America

Asian Culture and History 8 (2):135-147 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The international system is an arena for relations and interactions. Sometimes these relations are along with peace and sometimes with conflicts and tensions. Accordingly, countries use certain ideologies and policies that can lead to the promotion or demotion of their position in the international system. The collapse of the Soviet Union was a turning point for the change of the nature of the international system -from bipolar to unipolar- and also Russia’s attempt to redefine its lost identity which prepared the ground for the influx of new discussions and approaches in the international arena. Seeking its lost identity, Russia came up with the reality that Atlantic Orientation and following the unipolar system not only did not solve its problems but led to its decline, disappointment and frustration at the internal and international level; therefore, with Putin’s accession to power, another major turning point came in Russian foreign policies, which led to the improvement of the economic conditions in Russia following the increase in the oil price and Putin’s strategic leadership and management. The policy and approach taken in Russia originated from the self-confidence it had built up. This not only increased Russia’s maneuverability at the region but leveled the ground for its confrontation with America and challenging the unipolar system. As a result, adopting the Eurasian Orientation policy since 2000 not only caused Russia’s attention to turn to Central Asia countries and Caucasus but has also promoted an aggressive or offensive attitude in the policies taken by this country. Thus, taking an Offensive Realism approach, the present study seeks to find an answer to this question: What is the role and effect of Eurasian Orientation policy on Russia’s foreign policies towards America? The data for this study were collected by drawing on dissertations, libraries and research findings and analyzed using a descriptive analytic approach.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,571

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Vladimir Putin: His Continuing Legacy.Dale R. Herspring - 2009 - Social Research: An International Quarterly 76 (1):151-174.
Polish-Russian Economic Relations Under the Conditions of System Transformation.Paweł Bożyk - 2011 - International Studies. Interdisciplinary Political and Cultural Journal 13 (1):19-26.
Putin's Russia: The Quest for a New Place.Fyodor Lukyanov - 2009 - Social Research: An International Quarterly 76 (1):117-150.
The Ukraine Crisis and Shift in us Foreign Policy.Michał Woźniak - 2016 - International Studies. Interdisciplinary Political and Cultural Journal 18 (2):87-102.
Russian-Estonian Relations After 2007: Current Status and Development Prospects.Agata Włodarska - 2011 - International Studies. Interdisciplinary Political and Cultural Journal 13 (1):40-47.
The Individual and Healthcare in the New Russia.Pavel Tichtchenko - 1995 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 4 (1):75.
Is Russia Becoming Capitalist?David M. Kotz - 2001 - Science and Society 65 (2):157 - 181.
Editor's Introduction.James P. Scanlan - 1993 - Russian Studies in Philosophy 31 (4):3-8.
Crisis of the Tradition.O. K. Shimanskaya - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 38:105-111.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-01-09

Downloads
2 (#1,800,073)

6 months
1 (#1,469,469)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references