What should a theory of vision look like?

Philosophical Psychology 21 (5):585 – 599 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX


This paper argues for two major revisions in the way philosophers standardly think of vision science and vision theories more generally. The first concerns mental representations and the second supervenience. The central result is that the way is cleared for an externalist theory of perception. The framework for such a theory has what are called Aristotelian representations as elements in processes the well-functioning of which is the principal object of a theory of vision.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,323

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A logic of vision.Jaap M. van der Does & Michiel van Lambalgen - 2000 - Linguistics and Philosophy 23 (1):1-92.
Marr’s Computational Theory of Vision.Patricia Kitcher - 1988 - Philosophy of Science 55 (March):1-24.
Berkeley's revolution in vision.Margaret Atherton - 1990 - Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Works on vision.George Berkeley - 1963 - Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press. Edited by Colin Murray Turbayne.
The cartesian theory of vision.John Hyman - 1986 - Ratio (Misc.) 28 (December):149-167.


Added to PP

62 (#261,732)

6 months
3 (#984,214)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Anne Jacobson
University of Houston

Citations of this work

Revisiting the Intentionality All-Stars.Walter Veit - 2022 - Review of Analytic Philosophy 2 (1):31-54.
Phenomenal Intentionality and the Problem of Representation.Walter Ott - 2016 - Journal of the American Philosophical Association 2 (1):131--145.
Representing the impossible.Jennifer Matey - 2013 - Philosophical Psychology 26 (2):188 - 206.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Language of Thought.Jerry A. Fodor - 1975 - Harvard University Press.
An essay concerning human understanding.John Locke - 1689 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by Pauline Phemister.
The Language of Thought.J. A. Fodor - 1978 - Critica 10 (28):140-143.
Philosophical remarks.Ludwig Wittgenstein - 1975 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Rush Rhees.

View all 25 references / Add more references