Philosophical remarks

Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Rush Rhees (1975)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

When in May 1930, the Council of Trinity College, Cambridge, had to decide whether to renew Wittgenstein's research grant, it turned to Bertrand Russell for an assessment of the work Wittgenstein had been doing over the past year. His verdict: "The theories contained in this new work . . . are novel, very original and indubitably important. Whether they are true, I do not know. As a logician who likes simplicity, I should like to think that they are not, but from what I have read of them I am quite sure that he ought to have an opportunity to work them out, since, when completed, they may easily prove to constitute a whole new philosophy." "[ Philosophical Remarks ] contains the seeds of Wittgenstein's later philosophy of mind and of mathematics. Principally, he here discusses the role of indispensable in language, criticizing Russell's The Analysis of Mind . He modifies the Tractatus 's picture theory of meaning by stressing that the connection between the proposition and reality is not found in the picture itself. He analyzes generality in and out of mathematics, and the notions of proof and experiment. He formulates a pain/private-language argument and discusses both behaviorism and the verifiability principle. The work is difficult but important, and it belongs in every philosophy collection."--Robert Hoffman, Philosophy "Any serious student of Wittgenstein's work will want to study his Philosophical Remarks as a transitional book between his two great masterpieces. The Remarks is thus indispensible for anyone who seeks a complete understanding of Wittgenstein's philosophy."--Leonard Linsky, American Philosophical Association.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Intuitionistic mathematics and wittgenstein.Wenceslao J. Gonzalez - 1991 - History and Philosophy of Logic 12 (2):167-183.
Whose Ethics? Which Wittgenstein?Duncan Richter - 2002 - Philosophical Papers 31 (3):323-342.
On some much maligned remarks of Wittgenstein on gödel.Charles Sayward - 2001 - Philosophical Investigations 24 (3):262–270.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
184 (#102,805)

6 months
22 (#114,172)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references