Reply to a response

Philosophy of Science 37 (3):449-451 (1970)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

While disagreeing with some of the detail of my argument in [2] F. John Clendinnen accepts its conclusion, namely, that the vindication he proposed in [1] fails. I will thus confine myself to saying, very briefly, why I think the new vindication of induction that he sketches in [3] also fails.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1086/288321

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,932

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Reply to Edwards' response.N. Colegrave & A. Buckling - 2006 - Bioessays 28 (4):442-442.
Reply to Edwards' response.Klaus Dietz - 2006 - Bioessays 28 (4):441-441.
Beyond interpretation: Reply to Cummins' response. [REVIEW]Michael Morris - 1992 - Minds and Machines 2 (1):85-95.
Reflections (4 of 4): Reply to spier’s response to "discourse and moral responsibility in biotechnical communication".Dale Jamieson - 2000 - Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (2):285-287.
A response to Jackson.F. John Clendinnen - 1970 - Philosophy of Science 37 (3):444-448.
Discussion: Katz on the vindication of induction.F. John Clendinnen - 1965 - Philosophy of Science 32 (3/4):370.
Robustness and the new Riddle revived.Adina L. Roskies - 2008 - Ratio 21 (2):218–230.
In defence of science: Two ways to rehabilitate Reichenbach's vindication of induction.Jochen Briesen - forthcoming - The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.
Fool me once: Can indifference vindicate induction?Zach Barnett & Han Li - 2018 - Episteme 15 (2):202-208.
Reply to Smook.Antony Flew - 1975 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 4 (3):495 - 497.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
9 (#1,269,071)

6 months
2 (#1,446,987)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Frank Jackson
Australian National University

Citations of this work

Idealist Origins: 1920s and Before.Martin Davies & Stein Helgeby - 2014 - In Graham Oppy & Nick Trakakis (eds.), History of Philosophy in Australia and New Zealand. Dordrecht: Springer. pp. 15-54.
Clendinnen, Jackson, and induction.Gary Jones - 1979 - Philosophy of Science 46 (3):466-469.
Philosophy, Drama and Literature.Rick Benitez - 2011 - In Graham Robert Oppy, Nick Trakakis, Lynda Burns, Steven Gardner & Fiona Leigh (eds.), A companion to philosophy in Australia & New Zealand. Clayton, Victoria, Australia: Monash University Publishing. pp. 371-372.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Induction and objectivity.F. John Clendinnen - 1966 - Philosophy of Science 33 (3):215-229.
A response to Jackson.F. John Clendinnen - 1970 - Philosophy of Science 37 (3):444-448.

Add more references