Non-cogntivism, normativity, belief

Ratio 12 (4):420–435 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I argue that the (widely accepted) normative constraints on belief raise a serious problem for non-cognitivism about normativity

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

2002

DOI

10.1111/1467-9329.00102

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 86,507

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

How norms in technology ought to be interpreted.Krist Vaesen - 2006 - Techne 10 (1):117-133.
Does belief (only) aim at the truth?Daniel Whiting - 2012 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 93 (2):279-300.
Noncognitivism, normativity and belief: A reply to Jackson.David Enoch - 2001 - Ratio 14 (2):185–190.
On the aim of belief.David Velleman - 2000 - In The Possibility of Practical Reason. Oxford University Press. pp. 244--81.
Intentionality, normativity, and a problem for Searle.Michael Gorman - 2002 - Dialogue 41 (4):703-713.
Hypothetical and Categorical Epistemic Normativity.Chase B. Wrenn - 2004 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 42 (2):273-290.
There Are No Norms of Belief.David Papineau - 2013 - In Timothy Chan (ed.), The Aim of Belief. Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
75 (#189,505)

6 months
1 (#870,792)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Epistemic rationality as instrumental rationality: A critique.Thomas Kelly - 2003 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 66 (3):612–640.
The Normativity of Belief.Conor McHugh & Daniel Whiting - 2014 - Analysis 74 (4):698-713.
Why I’m still a proportionalist.Travis N. Rieder - 2016 - Philosophical Studies 173 (1):251-270.
Reasons and Entailment.Bart Streumer - 2007 - Erkenntnis 66 (3):353-374.

View all 15 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references