- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Best Interests or Harm to Reverse Parental Decisions: Each in Its Own Domain
American Journal of Bioethics 18 (8):41-44 (2018)
Abstract
The justification for restrictive state intervention (RSI) such as criminal punishment or state reversal of parental decisions is called a limiting, or intervention (Buchanan and Brock 1989, 10), p...My notes
Similar books and articles
Intervention principles in pediatric health care: the difference between physicians and the state.D. Robert MacDougall - 2019 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 40 (4):279-297.
Parental refusals of medical treatment: The harm principle as threshold for state intervention.Douglas Diekema - 2004 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 25 (4):243-264.
The harm threshold and Mill’s harm principle.Maggie Taylor - 2024 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 45 (1):5-23.
A sufficiency threshold is not a harm principle: A better alternative to best interests for overriding parental decisions.Ben Saunders - 2020 - Bioethics 35 (1):90-97.
When Should Society Override Parental Decisions? A Proposed Test to Mediate Refusals of Beneficial Treatments and of Life-Saving Treatments for Children.Allan J. Jacobs - 2021 - In Nico Nortjé & Johan C. Bester (eds.), Pediatric Ethics: Theory and Practice. Springer Verlag. pp. 421-436.
Decision Making on Behalf of Children: Understanding the Role of the Harm Principle.Douglas S. Diekema - 2019 - Journal of Clinical Ethics 30 (3):207-212.
Whose harm? Which metaphysic?Abram Brummett - 2019 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 40 (1):43-61.
Indeterminacy and the normative basis of the harm threshold for overriding parental decisions: a response to Birchley.Rosalind J. McDougall - 2016 - Journal of Medical Ethics 42 (2):119-120.
Parental discretion and children's rights: Background and implications for medical decision-making.Ferdinand Schoeman - 1985 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 10 (1):45-62.
Analytics
Added to PP
2018-08-24
Downloads
21 (#728,521)
6 months
5 (#836,811)
2018-08-24
Downloads
21 (#728,521)
6 months
5 (#836,811)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Rumors of the Best Interest Standard’s Demise Have Been Greatly Exaggerated, and the Harm Principle Remains Tenuous: Responding to My Commentators.Johan Christiaan Bester - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (8):W1-W5.
References found in this work
Family Values: The Ethics of Parent-Child Relationships.Harry Brighouse & Adam Swift - 2014 - Princeton University Press.
The zone of parental discretion: An ethical tool for dealing with disagreement between parents and doctors about medical treatment for a child.Lynn Gillam - 2016 - Clinical Ethics 11 (1):1-8.
Parental refusals of medical treatment: The harm principle as threshold for state intervention.Douglas Diekema - 2004 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 25 (4):243-264.
The moral limits of the criminal Law.Joël Feinberg - 1984 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 93 (2):279-279.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6686886f5-2nz2h uwo