Best Interests or Harm to Reverse Parental Decisions: Each in Its Own Domain

American Journal of Bioethics 18 (8):41-44 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The justification for restrictive state intervention (RSI) such as criminal punishment or state reversal of parental decisions is called a limiting, or intervention (Buchanan and Brock 1989, 10), p...

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1080/15265161.2018.1485770

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Parental refusals of medical treatment: The harm principle as threshold for state intervention.Douglas Diekema - 2004 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 25 (4):243-264.
Observational research with adolescents: a framework for the management of the parental permission. [REVIEW]Ruiz-Canela Miguel, Burgo Cristina Lopez-del, Carlos Silvia, Calatrava Maria, Beltramo Carlos, Osorio Alfonso & de Irala Jokin - 2013 - BMC Medical Ethics 14 (1):2-.
Overruling parental decisions in paediatric medicine: A comparison of Diekema’s Harm Threshold Framework and the Zone of Parental Discretion Framework.Vicki Xafis - 2017 - Clinical Ethics 12 (3):143-149.
Family interests and medical decisions for children.Paul Baines - 2017 - Bioethics 31 (8):599-607.
Smoky Rooms and Fuzzy Harms: How Should the Law Respond to Harmful Parental Practices?M. F. Jonas & S. J. Thornley - 2011 - Public Health Ethics 4 (2):129-142.
Harm is all you need? Best interests and disputes about parental decision-making.Giles Birchley - 2016 - Journal of Medical Ethics 42 (2):111-115.
Parenting and the Best Interests of Minors.R. S. Downie & F. Randall - 1997 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 22 (3):219-231.
Qué hijos tener. Libertad procreativa, autonomía parental y principio del daño.Blanca Rodríguez López - 2011 - Telos: Revista Iberoamericana de Estudios Utilitaristas 18 (1):127-151.
Parental genetic shaping and parental environmental shaping.Anca Gheaus - 2017 - Philosophical Quarterly 67 (267):20-31.
Indeterminacy and the normative basis of the harm threshold for overriding parental decisions: a response to Birchley.Rosalind J. McDougall - 2016 - Journal of Medical Ethics 42 (2):119-120.
The parental love argument against 'designing' babies: the harm in knowing that one has been selected or enhanced.Anca Gheaus - 2014 - In Ruth Chadwick, Mairi Levitt & Darren Shickle (eds.), The Right to Know and the Right Not to Know: Genetic Privacy and Responsibility. Cambridge University Press. pp. 151-164.
Resisting Moral Permissiveness about Vaccine Refusal.Mark Navin - 2013 - Public Affairs Quarterly 27 (1):69-85.
Harm isn't all you need: parental discretion and medical decisions for a child: Table 1.Dominic Wilkinson & Tara Nair - 2016 - Journal of Medical Ethics 42 (2):116-118.
How Much Weight Should We Give To Parental Interests In Decisions About Life Support For Newborn Infants?Dominic Wilkinson - 2010 - Monash Bioethics Review 29 (2):16-40.
Parental Authority in Pediatrics: A Discussion of its Justification and Limitations.Jeffrey C. Jennings - 2000 - Dissertation, Georgetown University

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-08-24

Downloads
21 (#718,251)

6 months
6 (#504,917)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

The moral limits of the criminal law.Joel Feinberg - 1984 - New York: Oxford University Press.
The moral limits of the criminal Law.Joël Feinberg - 1984 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 93 (2):279-279.

View all 19 references / Add more references