- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Indeterminacy and the normative basis of the harm threshold for overriding parental decisions: a response to Birchley
Journal of Medical Ethics 42 (2):119-120 (2016)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)DOI
10.1136/medethics-2015-103174
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Harm is all you need? Best interests and disputes about parental decision-making.Giles Birchley - 2016 - Journal of Medical Ethics 42 (2):111-115.
The harm threshold and parents’ obligation to benefit their children.Giles Birchley - 2016 - Journal of Medical Ethics 42 (2):123-126.
Overriding parents’ medical decisions for their children: a systematic review of normative literature.Rosalind J. McDougall & Lauren Notini - 2014 - Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (7):448-452.
Parental refusals of medical treatment: The harm principle as threshold for state intervention.Douglas Diekema - 2004 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 25 (4):243-264.
Qué hijos tener. Libertad procreativa, autonomía parental y principio del daño.Blanca Rodríguez López - 2011 - Telos: Revista Iberoamericana de Estudios Utilitaristas 18 (1):127-151.
Assessing Baselines for Identifying Harm: Tricky Cases and Childhood.Monique Jonas - 2016 - Res Publica 22 (4):387-404.
Observational research with adolescents: a framework for the management of the parental permission. [REVIEW]Ruiz-Canela Miguel, Burgo Cristina Lopez-del, Carlos Silvia, Calatrava Maria, Beltramo Carlos, Osorio Alfonso & de Irala Jokin - 2013 - BMC Medical Ethics 14 (1):2-.
Smoky Rooms and Fuzzy Harms: How Should the Law Respond to Harmful Parental Practices?M. F. Jonas & S. J. Thornley - 2011 - Public Health Ethics 4 (2):129-142.
Response to the Australian Government Advisory Council on Intellectual Property's Request for Written Comments on Patentable Subject Matter†.Justine Pila - unknown
The parental love argument against 'designing' babies: the harm in knowing that one has been selected or enhanced.Anca Gheaus - 2014 - In Ruth Chadwick, Mairi Levitt & Darren Shickle (eds.), The Right to Know and the Right Not to Know Genetic Privacy and Responsibility. Cambridge University Press. pp. 151-164.
What limits, if any, should be placed on a parent's right to consent and/or refuse to consent to medical treatment for their child?Giles Birchley - 2010 - Nursing Philosophy 11 (4):280-285.
Harm isn't all you need: parental discretion and medical decisions for a child: Table 1.Dominic Wilkinson & Tara Nair - 2016 - Journal of Medical Ethics 42 (2):116-118.
Analytics
Added to PP
2016-02-04
Downloads
13 (#786,274)
6 months
1 (#479,744)
2016-02-04
Downloads
13 (#786,274)
6 months
1 (#479,744)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
The Harm Principle Cannot Replace the Best Interest Standard: Problems With Using the Harm Principle for Medical Decision Making for Children.Johan Christiaan Bester - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (8):9-19.
When Parents Refuse: Resolving Entrenched Disagreements Between Parents and Clinicians in Situations of Uncertainty and Complexity.Janine Penfield Winters - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (8):20-31.
The harm threshold and parents’ obligation to benefit their children.Giles Birchley - 2016 - Journal of Medical Ethics 42 (2):123-126.
“The edge of harm and help”: ethical considerations in the care of transgender youth with complex family situations.Beth A. Clark, Alice Virani & Elizabeth M. Saewyc - 2020 - Ethics and Behavior 30 (3):161-180.
Why the Best Interest Standard Is Not Self-Defeating, Too Individualistic, Unknowable, Vague or Subjective.Loretta M. Kopelman - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (8):34-36.
References found in this work
Principles of biomedical ethics.Tom L. Beauchamp - 1989 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by James F. Childress.
Parental refusals of medical treatment: The harm principle as threshold for state intervention.Douglas Diekema - 2004 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 25 (4):243-264.
Deciding for a child: a comprehensive analysis of the best interest standard. [REVIEW]Erica K. Salter - 2012 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 33 (3):179-198.
[Book review] children, families, and health care decision making. [REVIEW]Lainie Friedman Ross - 2002 - Ethics 112 (3):639-641.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-768c78dffc-hj28s N