Independence of Faris-rejection-axioms

Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 1 (1-2):48-51 (1960)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1305/ndjfl/1093956427

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,571

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Independence of two nice sets of axioms for the propositional calculus.T. Thacher Robinson - 1968 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 33 (2):265-270.
Discouraging results for ultraimaginary independence theory.Itay Ben-Yaacov - 2003 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 68 (3):846-850.
Frege on Axioms, Indirect Proof, and Independence Arguments in Geometry: Did Frege Reject Independence Arguments?Jamie Tappenden - 2000 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 41 (3):271-315.
Independence and justification in mathematics.Krzysztof Wójtowicz - 2006 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 91 (1):349-373.
Axiomatizing a category of categories.Colin McLarty - 1991 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 56 (4):1243-1260.
Independence of rose's axioms for m-valued implication.Ernest Edmonds - 1969 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 34 (2):283-284.
Independence of one system of axioms and rules of inference for the propositional calculas.N. Georgiewa - 1971 - Studia Logica 28 (1):70-70.
The independence of axioms in the propositional calculus.G. E. Hughes - 1957 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 35 (1):21 – 29.
The independence of Quine's axioms * 200 and * 201.Barkley Rosser - 1941 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 6 (3):96 - 97.
Remarks on Independence Proofs and Indirect Reference.Günther Eder - 2013 - History and Philosophy of Logic 34 (1):68-78.
On the independence of Henkin's axioms for fragments of the propositional calculus.Maurice L'abbé - 1951 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 16 (1):43-45.
On the independence of certain axioms in the definition of an $m$-arrangement.Michael C. Gemignani - 1967 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 8 (3):225-226.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
17 (#862,032)

6 months
4 (#779,649)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references