Discouraging results for ultraimaginary independence theory

Journal of Symbolic Logic 68 (3):846-850 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Dividing independence for ultraimaginaries is neither symmetric nor transitive. Moreover, any notion of independence satisfying certain axioms (weaker than those for independence in a simple theory) and defined for all ultraimaginary sorts, is necessarily trivial

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
63 (#251,829)

6 months
8 (#347,798)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Plus ultra.Frank O. Wagner - 2015 - Journal of Mathematical Logic 15 (2):1550008.
On supersimplicity and lovely pairs of cats.Itaï Ben Yaacov - 2006 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 71 (3):763-776.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Simplicity, and Stability in There.Byunghan Kim - 2001 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 66 (2):822-836.

Add more references