The Heuristic and Methodological Potential of the Concept “Scientific Revolution”

Dialogue and Universalism 24 (3):103-109 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The concept of revolution in science is widely used in philosophy of science. We believe that the concept of revolution was borrowed from social-political literature and without any philosophical analysis was transferred to history of science. For this reason, attempts to transform that concept into an efficient instrument of building a theory of the development of scientific knowledge cannot be successful. This concept is nothing more than a metaphor for emphasizing empirical and theoretical discoveries of great significance in the history of science

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,612

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Revolution Versus Evolution: The Pattern of Conceptual Change in Science.Md Abdul Mannan - 2020 - Journal of the Indian Council of Philosophical Research 37 (2):175-189.
Cournot and Renouvier on Scientific Revolutions.Warren Schmaus - 2023 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 54 (1):7-17.
A New Concept of Reason?Andrew Feenberg - 2022 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 59 (4):189-220.
The Cognitive Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Hanne Andersen, Peter Barker & Xiang Chen - 2006 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Peter Barker & Xiang Chen.
The Socratic Dialogue as a Method of Organizational Learning.Jos Kessels - 1996 - Dialogue and Universalism 6 (5):53-67.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-01-31

Downloads
5 (#1,559,732)

6 months
3 (#1,206,820)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references