Rolling back the bureaucracies of ethics review

Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (8):525-526 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Dyck and Allen's criticisms of current systems of governance are well founded, at least in some jurisdictions. Their desire to halt the expansion and intensification of research ethics governance is to be applauded. However, their listed categories of research to be exempted from mandatory review may not create a better system

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,503

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Summaries and Comments. [REVIEW]Kenneth J. Rolling - 2009 - Review of Metaphysics 63 (2):455-500.
The design argument.Elliott Sober - 2004 - In William Mann (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Religion. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. pp. 117–147.
Bringing the state back in … again.Samuel DeCanio - 2000 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 14 (2-3):139-146.
Rolling out the map of justice.Jörgen Ödalen - 2008 - Distributor, Uppsala University Library.
Back to the Rough Ground: Wittgenstein and Politics.Paul Voice - 2005 - Politics and Ethics Review 1 (1):91-102.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-10-03

Downloads
18 (#825,681)

6 months
1 (#1,472,167)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations