The Open Future: Why Future Contingents are All False, by Patrick Todd [Book Review]

Metaphilosophy 54 (2-3):364-367 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1111/meta.12622

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,127

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The fictional future.Emily Caddick Bourne & C. Bourne - unknown
Future Contingents are all False! On Behalf of a Russellian Open Future.Patrick Todd - 2016 - Mind 125 (499):775-798.
The open future, bivalence and assertion.Corine Besson & Anandi Hattiangadi - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 167 (2):251-271.
In Defence of Ockhamism.Sven Rosenkranz - 2012 - Philosophia 40 (3):617-631.
Against the Russellian open future.Anders J. Schoubye & Brian Rabern - 2017 - Mind 126 (504): 1217–1237.
Aristotelian indeterminacy and the open future.Robert Williams - manuscript
Knowing Future Contingents.Ezio Di Nucci - 2012 - Logos and Episteme 3 (1):43-50.
The Open Future Square of Opposition: A Defense.Elijah Hess - 2017 - Sophia 56 (4):573-587.
The Open Future.Stephan Torre - 2011 - Philosophy Compass 6 (5):360-373.
The abundance of the future. A paraconsistent approach to future contingents.Roberto Ciuni & Carlo Proietti - 2013 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 22 (1):21-43.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-03-25

Downloads
50 (#327,457)

6 months
20 (#139,007)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David Ingram
University of York

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Nefarious Presentism.Jonathan Tallant & David Ingram - 2015 - Philosophical Quarterly 65 (260):355-371.
Presentism and the objection from being-supervenience.Brian Kierland & Bradley Monton - 2007 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 85 (3):485-497.
Changing Truthmakers: Reply to Tallant and Ingram.Ross Cameron - 2013 - Oxford Studies in Metaphysics 8:362.

Add more references