History, Economics, and Anthropology: The Work of Karl Polanyi

History and Theory 8 (2):165-212 (1969)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Polanyi's denial of the universal applicability of economic theory must be seen in the context of early socialist economics and the development of the sociology of knowledge by his contemporaries and compatriots Luka6s and Mannheim. Polanyi's classification of economic types to serve as a basis for a comparative, substantive economic theory-reciprocity, householding, redistribution, market exchange -distinguished modes of allocation rather than production. Regulation governing trade, markets, and money in economies of reciprocity and redistribution received particular attention. The classification is useful not so much for identifying economies corresponding to the ideal types as for analyzing the interrelations between subsets of institutions in a single economy. Polanyi's own work on the "port of trade" is an example. His ideas are also used by ancient historians

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,932

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-04

Downloads
14 (#993,837)

6 months
1 (#1,722,083)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The reproving of Karl Polanyi.Santhi Hejeebu & Deirdre McCloskey - 1999 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 13 (3-4):285-314.
Death toHomo Economicus?J. G. Merquior - 1991 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 5 (3):353-378.
Weber, Polanyi, and Finley.Daniel P. Tompkins - 2008 - History and Theory 47 (1):123-136.
Review: Weber, Polanyi, and Finley. [REVIEW]Daniel P. Tompkins - 2008 - History and Theory 47 (1):123-136.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references