Emergence, not supervenience

Philosophy of Science Supplement 64 (4):337-45 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I argue that supervenience is an inadequate device for representing relations between different levels of phenomena. I then provide six criteria that emergent phenomena seem to satisfy. Using examples drawn from macroscopic physics, I suggest that such emergent features may well be quite common in the physical realm

Other Versions

reprint Humphreys, Paul (1997) "Emergence, Not Supervenience". Philosophy of Science 64(S4):S337-S345

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 96,438

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Emergence and Supervenience.Gregory R. Peterson - 2002 - Tradition and Discovery 29 (3):23-27.
Supervenience, emergence, realization, reduction.Jaegwon Kim - 2003 - In Michael J. Loux & Dean W. Zimmerman (eds.), The Oxford handbook of metaphysics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Synchronic and diachronic emergence.Paul Humphreys - 2008 - Minds and Machines 18 (4):431-442.
Robust supervenience and emergence.Alexander Rueger - 2000 - Philosophy of Science 67 (3):466-491.
Beyond Supervenience and Construction.David-Hillel Ruben - 2014 - Journal of Social Ontology 1 (1):121-141.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
459 (#50,872)

6 months
27 (#144,136)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Paul Humphreys
University of Virginia

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references