Collective responsibility and fraud in scientific communities

In Saba Bazargan-Forward & Deborah Perron Tollefsen (eds.), Routledge Handbook of Collective Responsibility. Routledge (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Given the importance of scientific research in shaping our perception of the world, and our senses of what policies will and won’t succeed in altering that world, it is of great practical, political, and moral importance that we carry out scientific research with integrity. The phenomenon of scientific fraud stands in the way of that, as scientists may knowingly enter claims they take to be false into the scientific literature, often knowingly doing so in defiance of norms they profess allegiance to. In this chapter we take a look at some of the causes of scientific fraud, and how it might be manifested in large-scale research teams and situations of anonymous authorship. We find that such cases make trouble for what might seem like intuitive answers to the question “who should be held responsible for this fraud?”, and we argue that in such cases it would be better to hold the entire community responsible for seeing to it that there is less fraud.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,774

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On fraud.Liam Kofi Bright - 2017 - Philosophical Studies 174 (2):291-310.
Fraud in the lab: the high stakes of scientific research.Nicolas Chevassus-au-Louis - 2019 - Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Accountability and responsibility in research.Patricia K. Woolf - 1991 - Journal of Business Ethics 10 (8):595 - 600.
Fraud and misconduct in research: detection, investigation, and organizational response.Nachman Ben-Yehuda - 2017 - Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Edited by Amalya Lumerman Oliver.
Fraud in science.Robert L. Park - 2008 - Social Research: An International Quarterly 75 (4):1135-1150.
The Office of Scientific Integrity.David P. Hamilton - 1992 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 2 (2):171-175.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-09-13

Downloads
6 (#711,559)

6 months
3 (#1,723,834)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references