- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Scientific reasoning: the Bayesian approach.Peter Urbach & Colin Howson - 1993 - Chicago: Open Court. Edited by Peter Urbach.
On Chihara's ‘The Howson–Urbach Proofs of Bayesian Principles’.Colin Howson - 1997 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (1):83-90.
The Scope of Bayesian Reasoning.Henry Kyburg - 1992 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992:139 - 152.
Review. Scientific reasoning: the Bayesian approach. Colin Howson, Peter Urbach.Barry Gower - 1997 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (1):126-131.
Bayesian Networks in Philosophy.Stephan Hartmann & Luc Bovens - 2002 - In Benedikt Lowe, Wolfgang Malzkorn & Thoralf Räsch (eds.), Foundations of The Formal Sciences II. Applications of Mathematical Logic in Philosophy and Linguistics [Trends in Logic]. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 39-46.
Ramsey and the measurement of belief.Richard Bradley - 2001 - In David Corfield & Jon Williamson (eds.), Foundations of Bayesianism.
Bayesian versus non-Bayesian approaches to confirmation.Colin Howson & Peter Urbach - 2010 - In Antony Eagle (ed.), Philosophy of Probability: Contemporary Readings. New York: Routledge.
On Chihara's ‘The Howson–Urbach Proofs of Bayesian Principles’.Colin Howson - 1997 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (1):83-90.
Subjective Probabilities as Basis for Scientific Reasoning?Franz Huber - 2005 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56 (1):101-116.
Why Bayesians Needn’t Be Afraid of Observing Many Non-black Non-ravens.Florian F. Schiller - 2012 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 43 (1):77-88.
Analytics
Added to PP
2012-06-19
Downloads
2 (#1,787,337)
6 months
1 (#1,516,429)
2012-06-19
Downloads
2 (#1,787,337)
6 months
1 (#1,516,429)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Putting inference to the best explanation in its place.Timothy Day & Harold Kincaid - 1994 - Synthese 98 (2):271-295.
From a boson to the standard model Higgs: a case study in confirmation and model dynamics.Cristin Chall, Martin King, Peter Mättig & Michael Stöltzner - 2019 - Synthese 198 (Suppl 16):3779-3811.
Meaning and reference from a probabilistic point of view.Jacob Feldman & Lee-Sun Choi - 2022 - Cognition 223 (C):105058.
Revisiting the two predominant statistical problems: the stopping-rule problem and the catch-all hypothesis problem.Yusaku Ohkubo - 2021 - Annals of the Japan Association for Philosophy of Science 30:23-41.
A belief network approach to optimization and parameter estimation: application to resource and environmental management.Olli Vans - 1998 - Artificial Intelligence 101 (1-2):135-163.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c76586df8-4c2ch uwo