Accuracy of prediction: A note on David Miller's problem

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 29 (2):179-183 (1978)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1093/bjps/29.2.179

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,774

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Accuracy, Language Dependence, and Joyce’s Argument for Probabilism.Branden Fitelson - 2012 - Philosophy of Science 79 (1):167-174.
David Miller. A paradox of information. The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 17 no. 1 , pp. 59–61. - Karl R. Popper. A comment on Miller's new paradox of information. The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 17 no. 1 , pp. 61–69. - Karl R. Popper. A paradox of zero information. The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 17 no. 2, pp. 141–143. - J. L. Mackie. Miller's so-called paradox of information.The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 17 no. 2, pp. 144–147. - David Miller. On a so-called so-called paradox: a reply to Professor J. L. Mackie.The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 17 no. 2, pp. 147–149. - Jeffrey Bub and Michael Radner. Miller's paradox of information.The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 19 no. 1 , pp. 63–67. - David Miller. The straight and narrow rule of induction: a reply to Dr Bub and Mr Radner.The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 19 no. 2, pp. 145. [REVIEW]Richard C. Jeffrey - 1970 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 35 (1):124-127.
Reply to David Harrah's discussion note.W. B. Gallie - 1959 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 10 (39):239-240.
Review: David Kaplan, Richard Montague, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic: A Paradox Regained; Martin Gardner, The British Journal of Philosophy of Science: A New Prediction Paradox; K. R. Popper, The British Journal of Philosophy of Science:A Comment on the New Prediction Paradox. [REVIEW]James Cargile - 1965 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 30 (1):102-103.
Miller's paradox of information.Jeffrey Bub & Michael Radner - 1968 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 19 (1):63-67.
Prediction, Probability, and Pragmatics.Ellery Eells - 2000 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 30 (2):183-206.
The language dependence of accuracy.Eric Barnes - 1990 - Synthese 84 (1):59 - 95.
Prediction, Probability, and Pragmatics.Ellery Eells - 2000 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 30 (2):183-206.
A suggested resolution of Miller's paradox.I. J. Good - 1970 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 21 (3):288-289.
David Kaplan and Richard Montague. A paradox regained. Notre Dame journal of formal logic, vol. 1 , pp. 79–90. - Martin Gardner. A new prediction paradox. The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 13 , p. 51. - K. R. Popper. A comment on the new prediction paradox. The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 13 , p. 51. [REVIEW]James Cargile - 1965 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 30 (1):102-103.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
34 (#123,329)

6 months
6 (#1,472,471)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Are All False Theories Equally False?Thomas Mormann - 1988 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 39 (4):505-519.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The accuracy of predictions.David Miller - 1975 - Synthese 30 (1-2):159 - 191.

Add more references