David Miller. A paradox of information. The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 17 no. 1 , pp. 59–61. - Karl R. Popper. A comment on Miller's new paradox of information. The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 17 no. 1 , pp. 61–69. - Karl R. Popper. A paradox of zero information. The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 17 no. 2, pp. 141–143. - J. L. Mackie. Miller's so-called paradox of information.The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 17 no. 2, pp. 144–147. - David Miller. On a so-called so-called paradox: a reply to Professor J. L. Mackie.The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 17 no. 2, pp. 147–149. - Jeffrey Bub and Michael Radner. Miller's paradox of information.The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 19 no. 1 , pp. 63–67. - David Miller. The straight and narrow rule of induction: a reply to Dr Bub and Mr Radner.The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 19 no. 2, pp. 145

Richard C. Jeffrey

Download from

dx.doi.org

More download options

David Miller. A paradox of information. The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 17 no. 1 , pp. 59–61. - Karl R. Popper. A comment on Miller's new paradox of information. The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 17 no. 1 , pp. 61–69. - Karl R. Popper. A paradox of zero information. The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 17 no. 2, pp. 141–143. - J. L. Mackie. Miller's so-called paradox of information.The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 17 no. 2, pp. 144–147. - David Miller. On a so-called so-called paradox: a reply to Professor J. L. Mackie.The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 17 no. 2, pp. 147–149. - Jeffrey Bub and Michael Radner. Miller's paradox of information.The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 19 no. 1 , pp. 63–67. - David Miller. The straight and narrow rule of induction: a reply to Dr Bub and Mr Radner.The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 19 no. 2, pp. 145 [Book Review]

Richard C. Jeffrey

Journal of Symbolic Logic 35 (1):124-127 (1970)

@article{Jeffrey1970-JEFDMA-3,
	author = {Richard C. Jeffrey},
	doi = {10.1017/s002248120009232x},
	journal = {Journal of Symbolic Logic},
	number = {1},
	pages = {124--127},
	title = {David Miller. A Paradox of Information. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 17 No. 1 , Pp. 59?61. - Karl R. Popper. A Comment on Miller's New Paradox of Information. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 17 No. 1 , Pp. 61?69. - Karl R. Popper. A Paradox of Zero Information. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 17 No. 2, Pp. 141?143. - J. L. Mackie. Miller's so-Called Paradox of Information.The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 17 No. 2, Pp. 144?147. - David Miller. On a so-Called so-Called Paradox: A Reply to Professor J. L. Mackie.The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 17 No. 2, Pp. 147?149. - Jeffrey Bub and Michael Radner. Miller's Paradox of Information.The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 19 No. 1 , Pp. 63?67. - David Miller. The Straight and Narrow Rule of Induction: A Reply to Dr Bub and Mr Radner.The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 19 No. 2, Pp. 145},
	volume = {35},
	year = {1970}
}

Jeffrey, Richard C. (1970). David Miller. A paradox of information. The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 17 no. 1, pp. 59–61. - Karl R. Popper. A comment on Miller's new paradox of information. The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 17 no. 1, pp. 61–69. - Karl R. Popper. A paradox of zero information. The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 17 no. 2, pp. 141–143. - J. L. Mackie. Miller's so-called paradox of information.The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 17 no. 2, pp. 144–147. - David Miller. On a so-called so-called paradox: a reply to Professor J. L. Mackie.The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 17 no. 2, pp. 147–149. - Jeffrey Bub and Michael Radner. Miller's paradox of information.The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 19 no. 1, pp. 63–67. - David Miller. The straight and narrow rule of induction: a reply to Dr Bub and Mr Radner.The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 19 no. 2, pp. 145. Journal of Symbolic Logic 35 (1):124-127.

Copy BIBT_EX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Cite

Plain text

BibTeX

Formatted text

Zotero

EndNote

Reference Manager

RefWorks

Options

Mark as duplicate

Find it on Scholar

Request removal from index

Revision history

Edit

Keywords

Add keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1017/s002248120009232x

My notes

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-30

Downloads
57 (#274,471)

6 months
10 (#257,583)

Historical graph of downloads

How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Have Your Cake and Eat It Too: The Old Principal Principle Reconciled with the New.Peter B. M. Vranas - 2004 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 69 (2):368-382.

What's in a numeral?David Miller - 1979 - Philosophical Studies 35 (4):323 - 344.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references

Applied ethics	Epistemology	History of Western Philosophy	Meta-ethics	Metaphysics	Normative ethics
Philosophy of biology	Philosophy of language	Philosophy of mind	Philosophy of religion	Science Logic and Mathematics	More ...

Abstract

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Citations of this work

References found in this work