Journal of Symbolic Logic 35 (1):124-127 (1970)
Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) |
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.1017/s002248120009232x |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Similar books and articles
Miller's so-Called Paradox of Information.J. L. Mackie - 1966 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 17 (2):144-147.
Miller's Paradox of Information.Jeffrey Bub & Michael Radner - 1968 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 19 (1):63-67.
A Comment on Miller's New Paradox of Information.Karl R. Popper - 1966 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 17 (1):61-69.
Erratum: A Comment on Miller's New Paradox of Information.Karl R. Popper - 1966 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 17 (3):264-264.
A Paradox of Information.David Miller - 1966 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 17 (1):59-61.
Miller's so-Called Paradox of Information.Colin Howson & Graham Oddie - 1979 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 30 (3):253-261.
The Straight and Narrow Rule of Induction: A Reply to Dr Bub and Mr Radner.David Miller - 1968 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 19 (2):145-152.
A Paradox of Information.A Comment on Miller's New Paradox of Information.A Paradox of Zero Information.Miller's So-Called Paradox: A Reply to Professor J. L. Mackie.Miller's Paradox of Information.The Straight and Narrow Rule of Induction: A Reply to Dr Bub and Mr Radner.New Mysteries for Old: The Transfiguration of Miller's Paradox.David Miller, Karl R. Popper, Jeffrey Bub & Michael Radner - 1970 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 35 (1):124-127.
On a so-Called so-Called Paradox: A Reply to Professor J. L. Mackie.David Miller - 1966 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 17:147.
Review: David Kaplan, Richard Montague, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic: A Paradox Regained; Martin Gardner, The British Journal of Philosophy of Science: A New Prediction Paradox; K. R. Popper, The British Journal of Philosophy of Science:A Comment on the New Prediction Paradox. [REVIEW]James Cargile - 1965 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 30 (1):102-103.
A Paradox of Zero Information.Karl R. Popper - 1966 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 17 (2):141-143.
A Suggested Resolution of Miller's Paradox.I. J. Good - 1970 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 21 (3):288-289.
New Mysteries for Old: The Transfiguration of Miller's Paradox.William W. Rozeboom - 1969 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 19 (4):345-353.
Karl R. Popper. Two Autonomous Axiom Systems for the Calculus of Probabilities. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 6 , Pp. 51–57. - K. R. Popper. Errata. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 6 , P. 176. - K. R. Popper. Corrigendum. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 6 , P. 351. [REVIEW]John G. Kemeny - 1958 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 23 (3):349-349.
Contentious Contents: For Inductive Probability.Andrew Elby - 1994 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45 (1):193-200.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2016-06-30
Total views
42 ( #271,853 of 2,518,713 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #408,070 of 2,518,713 )
2016-06-30
Total views
42 ( #271,853 of 2,518,713 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #408,070 of 2,518,713 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads