David Miller. A paradox of information. The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 17 no. 1 , pp. 59–61. - Karl R. Popper. A comment on Miller's new paradox of information. The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 17 no. 1 , pp. 61–69. - Karl R. Popper. A paradox of zero information. The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 17 no. 2, pp. 141–143. - J. L. Mackie. Miller's so-called paradox of information.The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 17 no. 2, pp. 144–147. - David Miller. On a so-called so-called paradox: a reply to Professor J. L. Mackie.The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 17 no. 2, pp. 147–149. - Jeffrey Bub and Michael Radner. Miller's paradox of information.The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 19 no. 1 , pp. 63–67. - David Miller. The straight and narrow rule of induction: a reply to Dr Bub and Mr Radner.The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 19 no. 2, pp. 145

Richard C. Jeffrey

doi:10.1017/s002248120009232x

David Miller. A paradox of information. The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 17 no. 1 , pp. 59–61. - Karl R. Popper. A comment on Miller's new paradox of information. The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 17 no. 1 , pp. 61–69. - Karl R. Popper. A paradox of zero information. The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 17 no. 2, pp. 141–143. - J. L. Mackie. Miller's so-called paradox of information.The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 17 no. 2, pp. 144–147. - David Miller. On a so-called so-called paradox: a reply to Professor J. L. Mackie.The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 17 no. 2, pp. 147–149. - Jeffrey Bub and Michael Radner. Miller's paradox of information.The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 19 no. 1 , pp. 63–67. - David Miller. The straight and narrow rule of induction: a reply to Dr Bub and Mr Radner.The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 19 no. 2, pp. 145 [Book Review]

Journal of Symbolic Logic 35 (1):124-127 (1970)

Abstract	This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords	No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories	Liar Paradox in Logic and Philosophy of Logic (categorize this paper)
DOI	10.1017/s002248120009232x
Options	Edit this record Mark as duplicate Export citation Find it on Scholar Request removal from index Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy Papers currently archived: 71,259

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)

Through your library

Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver..
Configure custom resolver

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

What's in a Numeral?David Miller - 1979 - Philosophical Studies 35 (4):323 - 344.

Add more citations

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-06-30

Total views
42 ( #271,853 of 2,518,713 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #408,070 of 2,518,713 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

Applied ethics	Epistemology	History of Western Philosophy	Meta-ethics	Metaphysics	Normative ethics
Philosophy of biology	Philosophy of language	Philosophy of mind	Philosophy of religion	Science Logic and Mathematics	More ...

Download options

References found in this work BETA

Citations of this work BETA

Similar books and articles

Analytics

My notes