Public health paternalism—a response to Nys

Public Health Ethics 2 (3):285-293 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Evaluating public health measures is one of the central tasks in public health ethics. Some public health measures incur the charge that they are paternalistic in an objectionable way. In a recent intriguing contribution to this journal, Thomas Nys responds to this complaint by setting out three challenges to be met if the charge is to be made good. The first challenge is that putatively objectionable public health measures in fact preserve autonomy; the second is that autonomy is not undermined by measures that are the upshot of democratic processes; the third is that it is a mistake to charge measures intended to benefit others with being objectionably paternalistic. Nys's explicit aim in presenting these challenges is not to show that the charge of paternalism in public health is never sound, but to stimulate further discussion. My paper takes up this invitation by responding to each of the challenges Nys presents, including discussing where they fail and identifying which succeed



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,164

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library


Added to PP

73 (#216,499)

6 months
6 (#403,662)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Stephen Holland
University of York

References found in this work

Public Health Ethics.Stephen Holland - 2007 - Hoboken, NJ: Polity.
Health-care needs and distributive justice.Norman Daniels - 1981 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 10 (2):146-179.
Paternalism in public health care.Thomas R. V. Nys - 2008 - Public Health Ethics 1 (1):64-72.
The Steward of the Millian State.Angus Dawson & Marcel Verweij - 2008 - Public Health Ethics 1 (3):193-195.

View all 8 references / Add more references