On the scientific inference from clinical trials

, &
Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 5 (2):157-162 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1046/j.1365-2753.1999.00206.x

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,881

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The epistemology and ethics of early stopping decisions in randomized controlled trials.Roger Stanev - 2012 - Dissertation, University of British Columbia
Shortcomings of the randomized controlled trial: a view from the boondocks.Joseph Herman Md - 1998 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 4 (4):283-286.
What evidence in evidence-based medicine?John Worrall - 2002 - Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association 2002 (3):S316-S330.
Randomized controlled trials versus rough set analysis: two competing approaches for evaluating clinical data.Tomasz Rzepiński - 2014 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 35 (4):271-288.
Analysis of scientific truth status in controlled rehabilitation trials.Roger Kerry, Aurélien Madouasse, Antony Arthur & Stephen D. Mumford - 2013 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 19 (4):617-625.
The philosophy of evidence-based medicine.Jeremy H. Howick - 2011 - Chichester, West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell, BMJ Books.
Attitudes to evidence in acupuncture: an interview study. [REVIEW]Kirsten Hansen - 2012 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 15 (3):279-285.
Bias in recruitment to cluster randomized trials: a review of recent publications. [REVIEW]Gwen Brierley, Sally Brabyn, David Torgerson & Judith Watson - 2012 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 18 (4):878-886.
EBM for the future.Alfred P. J. Lake - 2006 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 12 (4):433-437.
Statistics‐based research – a pig in a poke?James Penston - 2011 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 17 (5):862-867.
A comparison of the scientific quality of publicly and privately funded randomized controlled drug trials.Richard Jones, Stuart Younie, Andrew Macallister & Jim Thornton - 2010 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 16 (6):1322-1325.
Using imprecise probabilities to address the questions of inference and decision in randomized clinical trials.Lyle C. Gurrin, Peter D. Sly & Paul R. Burton - 2002 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 8 (2):255-268.
Problems associated with randomized controlled clinical trials in breast cancer.Ann E. Johnson - 1998 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 4 (2):119-126.
Riposte to Guest Commentaries on 'Problems associated with randomized controlled clinical trials in breast cancer'.Ann E. Johnson - 1998 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 4 (3):231-236.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-24

Downloads
18 (#832,773)

6 months
3 (#976,558)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Advancing the evidence‐based healthcare debate.A. Miles, P. Bentley, A. Polychronis, J. Grey & N. Price - 1999 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 5 (2):97-101.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The logic of scientific discovery.Karl Raimund Popper - 1934 - New York: Routledge. Edited by Hutchinson Publishing Group.

Add more references