Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):416-417 (2001)
AbstractIn conducting experiments, economists take more care than psychologists in specifying characteristics of people and tasks and are clearer about the conditions to which results can be generalized. Psychologists could learn much from this practice. They should also think in terms of programs of research – involving laboratory and field studies – that will allow them to test the generality of their theories.
Similar books and articles
Ethics in Psychology: Professional Standards and Cases.Gerald P. Koocher - 1998 - Oxford University Press.
Recognition and Categorization of Biologically Significant Objects by Rhesus Monkeys (Macaca Mulatta): The Domain of Food.Elizabeth Spelke - 2001 - Cognition 82 (2):127-155.
Ethical Concerns of Nonclinical Forensic Witnesses and Consultants.Jeffrey Pfeifer & John Brigham - 1993 - Ethics and Behavior 3 (3 & 4):329 – 343.
Experimental Practices in Economics: A Methodological Challenge for Psychologists?Ralph Hertwig & Andreas Ortmann - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):383-403.
Ethical Challenges for Cross-Cultural Research Conducted by Psychologists From the United States.Frederick T. L. Leong & Brent Lyons - 2010 - Ethics and Behavior 20 (3-4):250-264.
Variability is Not Uniformly Bad: The Practices of Psychologists Generate Research Questions.Scott A. Huettel & Gregory Lockhead - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):418-419.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads