On the Ethics of Withholding and Withdrawing Unwarranted Diagnoses

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 32 (3):425-433 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The number of diagnoses and the number of persons having diagnoses have increased substantially, and studies indicate that diagnoses are given or upheld even if they are unwarranted, that is, that they do not satisfy professionally accepted diagnostic criteria. In this article, the authors investigate the ethics of withholding and withdrawing unwarranted diagnoses. First, they investigate ethical aspects that make it difficult to withhold and to withdraw such diagnoses. Second, they scrutinize whether there are psychological factors, both in persons/patients and healthcare professionals, making it difficult to withdraw and withhold unwarranted diagnoses. Lastly, they use recent elements of the withholding-versus-withdrawing treatment debate in medical ethics to investigate whether there are any differences between withholding and withdrawing treatment and withdrawing and withholding unwarranted diagnoses. The authors conclude that it is crucial to acknowledge and address all these issues to reduce and avoid unwarranted diagnoses.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,592

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Withholding and Withdrawing Treatment: The Role of the Criminal Law.Leonard H. Glantz - 1987 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 15 (4):231-241.
Withholding and Withdrawing Treatment: The Role of the Criminal Law.Leonard H. Glantz - 1987 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 15 (4):231-241.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-01-06

Downloads
9 (#1,246,467)

6 months
4 (#779,041)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?