Inhabiting a Place in the Common: Profanation and Biopolitics in Teaching

Studier i Pædagogisk Filosofi 6 (1):69-82 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article considers the common and shared world in teaching, by reference to the concept of profanation in relation to biopolitics. “To profane”, means to treat something as worldly and as something “that can be played with”. The act of profanation has implications for how objects that are “put on the table” can be regarded in teaching and how these “objects” can become public goods. But what happens when things that are used in teaching are representations of social injustice and suffering? This article will give a critique of the idea of profanation, specifically discussing when teaching deals with social injustice and representations of suffering.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,438

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Interview.Roberto Esposito & Anna Paparcone - 2006 - Diacritics 36 (2):49-56.
An Outline for a Brief Teaching Demonstration.Shane Ralston - 2010 - Teaching Philosophy 33 (1):15-26.
Digital biopolitics : the image of life.F. J. Colman - 2016 - In S. E. Wilmer & Audrone Zukauskaite (eds.), Resisting biopolitics : philosophical, political and performative strategies. Abingdon, U.K: Routledge. pp. 189-201.
Foucault, Gary Becker and the Critique of Neoliberalism.David Newheiser - 2016 - Theory, Culture and Society 33 (5):3-21.
Biopolitics and/or biopower.Alpar Losonc - 2008 - Filozofija I Društvo 19 (1):153-189.
Puissances de la variation.Maurizio Lazzarato - 2000 - Multitudes 1 (1):187-200.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-03-28

Downloads
9 (#1,236,107)

6 months
1 (#1,498,742)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations