- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Honest research
Science and Engineering Ethics 1 (1):49-58 (1995)
Abstract
The origins of research projects, the duties of supervisors and research workers, the subjective elements in research and the difficulties of publication are reviewed, as a guide to the complexities of executing an honest research project. It is assumed that research carried out with maximal intellectual integrity will result in real advancesMy notes
Similar books and articles
Research Integrity Supervision Practices and Institutional Support: A Qualitative Study.Daniel Pizzolato & Kris Dierickx - 2023 - Journal of Academic Ethics 21 (3):427-448.
An introduction to research ethics.Paul J. Friedman - 1996 - Science and Engineering Ethics 2 (4):443-456.
Facilitating research ethics in qualitative research through doctoral supervision in the context of European Commission funding.Cathrine Moe, Lisbeth Uhrenfeldt & Ingjerd Gåre Kymre - forthcoming - Research Ethics.
A Thematic Review on Research Integrity and Research Supervision: Relationships, Crises and Critical Messages.Abdulghani Muthanna & Ahmed Alduais - 2020 - Journal of Academic Ethics 19 (1):95-113.
The role of scientific societies in promoting research integrity.Mark S. Frankel & Stephanie J. Bird - 2003 - Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (2):139-140.
Scientific societies and research integrity: What are they doing and how well are they doing it?Margot Iverson, Mark S. Frankel & Sanyin Siang - 2003 - Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (2):141-158.
The role of scientific associations in promoting research integrity and deterring research misconduct: Commentary on ‘challenges in studying the effects of scientific societies on research integrity’.Melissa S. Anderson & Joseph B. Shultz - 2003 - Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (2):269-272.
Six domains of research ethics: A heuristic framework for the responsible conduct of research.Kenneth D. Pimple - 2002 - Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (2):191-205.
Exploring the role of the research integrity officer: Commentary on ‘seven ways to plagiarize: Handling real allegations of research misconduct’.Lisa N. Geller - 2002 - Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (4):540-542.
Analytics
Added to PP
2013-12-01
Downloads
24 (#646,352)
6 months
7 (#592,073)
2013-12-01
Downloads
24 (#646,352)
6 months
7 (#592,073)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Some remarks on scientific positivism and constructivist epistemology in science.Ashok K. Vijh - 1996 - Science and Engineering Ethics 2 (1):5-8.
The University and the Responsible Conduct of Research: Who is Responsible for What? [REVIEW]Katherine Alfredo & Hillary Hart - 2011 - Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (3):447-457.
References found in this work
Realism and the aim of science.Karl R. Popper - 1983 - New York: Routledge. Edited by William Warren Bartley.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6686886f5-2nz2h uwo