Profits and Principles

Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 16:130-135 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Fairclough’s (1992) model of critical discourse analysis can be used to show how corporate social responsibility, stakeholder identity and the social relations between organisations and stakeholders are socially constructed in the social and environmental reports prepared by companies. An example from doctoral work-in-progress is provided. Preliminary findings suggest the Royal Dutch/Shell Group of Companies construct corporate social responsibility as functionalist and economically-based. Stakeholders, rather than equal partners, are pacified and persuaded to Shell’s understandings about corporate social responsibility.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,709

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Corporate Social Responsibility Boundaries.Celine Gainet - 2008 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 19:318-328.
Corporate Responsibility and Freedom.Eric Palmer - 2007 - International Corporate Responsibility Series 3:25-33.
Practicing the business of corporate social responsibility: a process perspective.Christa Thomsen & Jakob Lauring - 2008 - International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 4 (2):117.
Towards a Quantitative Model of Heterogeneity in Stakeholder Expectations of Corporate Responsibility.Carola Hillenbrand & Kevin Money - 2006 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 17:251-254.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-03-18

Downloads
20 (#764,377)

6 months
6 (#510,793)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references