Corporate Responsibility and Freedom

International Corporate Responsibility Series 3:25-33 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Milton Friedman’s famous comment on Corporate Social Responsibility is that “there is one and only one social responsibility of business—to use its resources and engage in activities to increase its profits so long as it stays within the rules of the game.” I reply to Friedman, Michael Jensen, and others, in argument that accepts their implicit premise—that business can be a virtuous mechanism of free society—but that denies their delimitation of responsibility. The reply hinges upon precisely the virtue of “freedom” these authors clearly value. In the extreme case where maximizing profits would place government under threat, such activity will not coincide with maximizing social value and would undermine the freedoms these authors claim to value. Responsibilities will also apply in less extreme cases, if we develop Amartya Sen’s argument showing that, “we have to see individual freedom as a social commitment.”.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,642

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Legitimate Social Demands on Corporations.Eric Palmer - 2006 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 17:151-154.
The ethics of business: Moving beyond legalism.Daryl Koehn - 1996 - Ethics and Behavior 6 (1):1 – 16.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
11 (#351,772)

6 months
333 (#62,926)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Eric Palmer
Allegheny College

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references