What Is a Will?

In Uri Maoz & Walter Sinnott-Armstrong (eds.), Free will: philosophers and neuroscientists in conversation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. pp. 11–20 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This chapter presents two contrasting pictures of the will. On the first, “the will” is a psychological structure or module within a person that originates spontaneous or endogenous activity, independently of external influence. On the second, “the will” is that collection of ordinary states of mind (cares, concerns, beliefs, desires, commitments, fears, etc.) that generates intentional, or voluntary, or responsible activity—it is the functioning together of those aspects of mind that account for human activity. A challenge is posed for each. The challenge for the first is to say how the outputs of this module are the activity of the person. The challenge for the second is to say how psychological activity that might be entirely explained by a person’s history and environment can nonetheless be free and responsible activity. The replies take up an important question about the role of consciousness, in each picture.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Introduction to 'Action and Production'.Pamela Hieronymi - 2022 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 22 (2).
When Is an Action Voluntary?Pamela Hieronymi - 2022 - In Uri Maoz & Walter Sinnott-Armstrong (eds.), Free will: philosophers and neuroscientists in conversation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. pp. 21–30.
The reasons of trust.Pamela Hieronymi - 2008 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 86 (2):213 – 236.
The Wrong Kind of Reason.Pamela Hieronymi - 2019 - In Jeremy Fantl, Matthew McGrath & Ernest Sosa (eds.), Contemporary epistemology: an anthology. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Wrongdoing and the Moral Emotions. [REVIEW]Pamela Hieronymi - 2022 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews.
Comments on Ruth Chang, ‘Three Dogmas of Normativity’.Pamela Hieronymi - 2023 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 40 (2):211-219.
A Method for Virtue. [REVIEW]Pamela Hieronymi - 2022 - Los Angeles Review of Books.
Mindscreen: Bergman, Godard, and first-person film.Bruce F. Kawin - 1978 - Rochester, New York: Dalkey Archive Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-05-22

Downloads
65 (#255,314)

6 months
65 (#77,786)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Pamela Hieronymi
University of California, Los Angeles

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Responsibility for believing.Pamela Hieronymi - 2008 - Synthese 161 (3):357-373.
Reflection and Responsibility.Pamela Hieronymi - 2014 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 42 (1):3-41.
Reasons for Action.Pamela Hieronymi - 2011 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 111 (3pt3):407-427.

Add more references