What's so special about Kruskal's theorem and the ordinal Γo? A survey of some results in proof theory

Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 53 (3):199-260 (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper consists primarily of a survey of results of Harvey Friedman about some proof-theoretic aspects of various forms of Kruskal's tree theorem, and in particular the connection with the ordinal Γ0. We also include a fairly extensive treatment of normal functions on the countable ordinals, and we give a glimpse of Verlen hierarchies, some subsystems of second-order logic, slow-growing and fast-growing hierarchies including Girard's result, and Goodstein sequences. The central theme of this paper is a powerful theorem due to Kruskal, the ‘tree theorem’, as well as a ‘finite miniaturization’ of Kruskal's theorem due to Harvey Friedman. These versions of Kruskal's theorem are remarkable from a proof-theoretic point of view because they are not provable in relatively strong logical systems. They are examples of so-called ‘natural independence phenomena’, which are considered by most logicians as more natural than the metamathematical incompleteness results first discovered by Gödel. Kruskal's tree theorem also plays a fundamental role in computer science, because it is one of the main tools for showing that certain orderings on trees are well founded. These orderings play a crucial role in proving the termination of systems of rewrite rules and the correctness of Knuth-Bendix completion procedures. There is also a close connection between a certain infinite countable ordinal called Γo and Kruskal's theorem. Previous definitions of the function involved in this connection are known to be incorrect, in that, the function is not monotonic. We offer a repaired definition of this function, and explore briefly the consequences of its existence

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,503

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Generalizations of the Kruskal-Friedman theorems.L. Gordeev - 1990 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 55 (1):157-181.
Proof theory and ordinal analysis.W. Pohlers - 1991 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 30 (5-6):311-376.
An intuitionistic proof of Kruskal’s theorem.Wim Veldman - 2004 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 43 (2):215-264.
Blunt and topless end extensions of models of set theory.Matt Kaufmann - 1983 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 48 (4):1053-1073.
Proof theory in philosophy of mathematics.Andrew Arana - 2010 - Philosophy Compass 5 (4):336-347.
Proofs and computations.Helmut Schwichtenberg - 2012 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by S. S. Wainer.
Proof-theoretic investigations on Kruskal's theorem.Michael Rathjen & Andreas Weiermann - 1993 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 60 (1):49-88.
Reflections on Concrete Incompleteness.G. Longo - 2011 - Philosophia Mathematica 19 (3):255-280.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-16

Downloads
25 (#627,632)

6 months
5 (#626,991)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Proof theory.Gaisi Takeuti - 1975 - New York, N.Y., U.S.A.: Sole distributors for the U.S.A. and Canada, Elsevier Science Pub. Co..
Systems of predicative analysis.Solomon Feferman - 1964 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 29 (1):1-30.
[product]¹2-logic, Part 1: Dilators.Jean-Yves Girard - 1981 - Annals of Mathematical Logic 21 (2):75.
Π12-logic, Part 1: Dilators.Jean-Yves Girard - 1981 - Annals of Mathematical Logic 21 (2-3):75-219.

View all 10 references / Add more references